|  
              Musician's Corner: Sell Your Soul To Rock-n-Roll? 
               
              By Tom Leu, MusicDish.com 
            What's your position on musicians or any celebrity 
              endorsing and selling consumer products and services? To some, this 
              practice is taboo, akin to selling your soul. To others, this is 
              sometimes a survival and often lucrative proposition. This topic 
              has been, and surely will continue to be debated by purists and 
              capitalists as long as commerce exists. 
            The argument is that musicians are watering down the 
              value of their artistic integrity by getting paid to hawk Doritos 
              or McDonalds for example. Does their credibility as songwriters 
              and players suddenly diminish because they're doing a commercial 
              for AT&T? Or are they simply padding their pocketbooks and gaining 
              additional exposure while affording themselves the opportunity to 
              continue to make the very music that people love? 
             
             
               
                 
                  
                    MusicDish Network Sponsor 
                      
                  
                 | 
               
             
            Does it make a difference if an act is very well established or just 
            getting started when considering sponsors and endorsements? Most often, 
            you have to be an established act or star to even be considered for 
            endorsements or sponsorships, but not always. Even at the local or 
            regional level, securing sponsorships for music events and merchandise 
            is not only possible, but also probable. 
            
            Obviously the logic is that famous artists and celebrities 
              have huge audiences just waiting to run out and buy whatever they're 
              selling. Look at Aerosmith, Garth Brooks, Britney Spears, and of 
              course KISS to name only a few. These acts have had no problem offering 
              up their star-studded names in exchange for a lot of extra green 
              backs to afford that extra house in the Bahamas. 
            I am always skeptical however whether these musicians 
              or celebrities are really using the products or services they endorse. 
              Does it really matter? Who cares as long as we think they are using 
              the stuff. Isn't that the basic premise of politics as well? We 
              don't really know exactly what our politicians are doing except 
              what they're telling us they're doing. By and large we want to believe 
              them, so we usually do, don't we? 
            Businesses at the local level are also looking for 
              new opportunities to get their name out there to new audiences. 
              Enter the local and regional musician. Here lies the opportunity 
              to secure corporate sponsors for upcoming gigs or promotional campaigns 
              promoting your new release, merchandise, etc. Sometimes, especially 
              for new artists with little or no money, obtaining sponsorships 
              from companies or private investors is the difference between being 
              broke and breaking through. 
            So the debate rages on. Some see no harm in making 
              a little extra scratch putting their name next to Nike, Hanes, Taco 
              Bell, Mountain Dew, or A1 Plumbing. Others vehemently oppose "selling 
              out," refusing to be Johnny and the Moondogs being brought to you 
              by Subway. 
            The benefits to securing sponsorships are...positive 
              cash flow, being attached to and associated with respectable and 
              reputable businesses, increased exposure while marketing to a sponsor's 
              target market, prestige in some cases depending on sponsor profile, 
              and newsworthiness. The disadvantages are... accusations of being 
              a capitalist, conforming to sponsor demands and demographics, maligned 
              by your contemporaries again for "selling out." 
            Are there some happy mediums that would allow groups 
              or individuals to take advantage of the additional "funding" out 
              there through sponsorships or endorsements without sacrificing all 
              of their artistic integrity? Is it possible for there to be a gray 
              area that isn't all or nothing all of the time? My position on this 
              topic is to possibly find and agree on reasonable middle ground 
              that could achieve both agendas. Never say never, and never say 
              always. 
            The Bottom Line: Whatever your position, musician 
              and celebrity endorsements of consumer goods always have, and always 
              will be a reality. The fact is that most "consumers" like the warm 
              fuzzies they get knowing that Britney Spears is guzzling Pepsi or 
              Dwight Yoakam is wearing GAP jeans. Personally, I like the Mountain 
              Dew commercial featuring the cool car rocking out to the Hoobastank 
              tune... who? 
             Provided 
              by the MusicDish 
              Network. Copyright © Tag 
              It 2003 - Republished with Permission 
           |